setOpposite

[Aaron113]

Can someone help me figure out what I'm doing wrong with the setOpposite?  It seems to put the true value in the groups slot when it should be putting it in the 4th argument (not counting calling_ply).   Perhaps I'm just confused because it's late and I'm tired, but I can't figure it out for my life.

Code: Lua

1. function ulx.restrict( calling_ply, type, target, groups, should_remove )
2.  
3. end
4. local restrict = ulx.command( CATEGORY_NAME, "ulx restrict", ulx.restrict )
5. restrict:addParam{ type=ULib.cmds.StringArg, hint="type", completes=urs.types.restrictions, ULib.cmds.restrictToCompletes }
6. restrict:addParam{ type=ULib.cmds.StringArg, hint="target or group" }
7. restrict:addParam{ type=ULib.cmds.StringArg, hint="groups", ULib.cmds.takeRestOfLine, ULib.cmds.optional }
8. restrict:setOpposite( "ulx unrestrict", {_, _, _, _, true}, "!unrestrict" )

[Aaron113]

Okay, change to my question.  Why is it now returning nil?  It was either returning nil or going in groups.  I figured out that you guys include calling_ply.  So that issue is fixed, but now it is always nil for should_remove.

[Tomzen]

Theres no function or anything for should_remove, thats probably why?

[Decicus]

If I remember right, you need to add should_remove as a boolean parameter. I believe I did something like this for setOpposite on some of my own commands:

Code: [Select]

restrict:addParam{ type=ULib.cmds.BoolArg, invisible=true }

[JamminR]

What decicus says.
You're only passing your function 4 parameters, but it's expecting 5.
SetOpposite isn't a variable that's passed to the function.

[Aaron113]

You guys are exactly right.  I must have been tired.  I could have easily figured that out myself.  I have never used it until now and it doesn't work how I was expecting it to heh.